Security & Compliance

Recognise risks before they escalate.

In security-critical roles, trust determines access – to weapons, sensitive data or critical infrastructure. Yet risk traits rarely show in a CV and hardly ever in a job interview.

CV
Job interview
Risk stays invisible

What you get

Traffic lights instead of gut feeling.

Triple Eye combines ITR and EED. The report has three levels: a summary with five traffic lights, a detailed evaluation per dimension and the interview report with reasoning for every statement.

Triple Eye · Report · SummarySample report · fictitious person

Overall aggravation tendency

Red

Red: The answers show a clear tendency to present oneself in a better light. The other traffic lights can only be interpreted to a limited extent – professional interpretation and clarification in conversation are needed.

Captures: The tendency to answer not according to one’s own attitude but in a way that promises a better result – usually a common, rather unintentional positive self-presentation.
Model: Aggravation scale
Assessment: ITR and EED

Evaluated by Dr. Jörg Prieler

Triple Eye · Report · Detailed evaluationSample report · fictitious person

Detailed evaluation · ITR

Stanine 1–9

Self-competence

Conscientiousness
← Works with little thoroughness, care and reliability.
Works thoroughly, carefully, prudently and reliably. →
Resilience
← Copes poorly with difficulties, resistance and stress.
Copes well with difficulties, resistance and stress. →
Personal responsibility
← Does not voluntarily take responsibility for the organisation and colleagues.
Voluntarily takes responsibility for the organisation and employees. →
Credibility
← Does not describe experienced situations and facts accurately.
Describes experienced and observed situations accurately and insightfully. →

Because of the red aggravation light, these scores can also only be interpreted to a limited extent. In the report: all dimensions, separated into ITR and EED, each with norm scale and a description of both poles.

Evaluated by Dr. Jörg Prieler

Triple Eye · Report · Interview reportSample report · fictitious person

Summary

The person describes their working day calmly and concretely. Many answers are consistently very positive – in line with the red aggravation light. The interpretation needs to be clarified in conversation.

Sample statements – not taken from the assessment

„I like to plan my working week in advance.“
Answer
rather true
Confidence
0.82
Reasoning
Says that she draws up a list for the week on Monday and adjusts it as needed.
„When something is unclear, I would rather ask once too often.“
Answer
fully true
Confidence
0.91
Reasoning
Answers very positively but gives no concrete example. Clarify in conversation.
Uncertain – flagged in the report
„I stay calm even under time pressure.“
Answer
partly
Confidence
0.58
Reasoning
Describes both: calm with familiar routines, tension with short-notice changes. Contradiction flagged openly.
Uncertain – flagged in the report

Evaluated by Dr. Jörg Prieler

How to read the traffic lights

Green: unremarkable
Yellow: borderline, clarify in conversation
Red: caution, professional interpretation needed

Only traffic lights are interpreted, never a single scale. No result is ever the sole basis for a decision.

The assessments in detail

ITR

Insider Threat Risk-Inventory

Purpose: Assessing the insider risk of people in security-critical roles, e.g. with access to weapons or data, in critical infrastructure or aviation.
What is measured: 16 dimensions in two groups: ten empirically derived personality dimensions (incl. resilience, personal responsibility, conscientiousness, credibility) and six risk factors based on the Endrass model.
Result: Stanine per dimension and four traffic lights (risk of violence, faking tendency, overall picture, projection). Result valid for twelve months.
Duration: approx. 30 minutes, 210 statements
Languages: German, English, Hungarian, Spanish; further translations possible

EED

Early-Extremism-Detection

Purpose: Early detection of personality patterns associated with extremism.
What is measured: Dark triad model (narcissism, psychopathy, Machiavellianism) and the Marneros model.
Result: Two traffic lights in the Triple Eye report: risk of racism and dark triad personality.

Triple Eye

The bundle

Purpose: ITR and EED in one assessment, optionally with a short cognitive battery.
Result: Summary with five traffic lights, plus a detailed report with stanine per dimension, faking bar and indications from response speed.
Duration: approx. 45 minutes
Protection against faking: Normative and ipsative statements, random selection from a pool of statements.

Duration and figures refer to the classic assessment (questionnaire).

Protection against faking

Faking is captured separately.

A feature of the classic assessment: anyone trying to appear better than they are leaves traces.

Statement pool

Aggravation

Response speed

Statement pool
Each person receives a random selection from a pool of statements.
Normative and ipsative
Two response formats check each other.
Aggravation scale
A dedicated scale captures whether someone exaggerates or plays things down.
Response speed
Unusual response times are flagged as an indication.

Measurement model: rating scale model (IRT), backed by factor analyses.

What the conversation adds

Result and reasoning. Side by side.

The AI interview maps the answers back to the same items as the questionnaire and adds confidence and reasoning. Every result is supported by passages from the conversation – traceable for experts and for compliance documentation.

Questionnaire
Conversation
Mapped back to item scores

You choose the format: a classic questionnaire or an AI interview.

How AI interviews work in general → Use cases

Who is behind it

The conversation is new. The method is proven.

The assessments were developed together with experts from criminology, psychiatry, state security and mathematical statistics.

Dr. Jörg Prieler

Test and military psychologist, author of the ITR

ITR: developed by Dr. Jörg Prieler; manual 2015.
Presented in 2019 at the ICT security conference of the Austrian Military Counter-Intelligence Office in Fürstenfeld.
Selection of air traffic controllers for Austro Control.

All assessments and milestones →

Data processing in the EU
Developed in Austria
Kolloqo – an assessment platform by IR&C

How we handle the data →

For experts

Questions before you start?

First, we clarify which areas are involved and which goals apply. Then comes the conversational design: tone, order, examples and, if needed, multilingual versions. Only then does it go live. Technically, little is needed – invitation links are enough, and participation works without an app.

Pricing for Security & Compliance is on the pricing page. View pricing →

Conversation has always been the better method. Now it scales.

Together, we’ll work out which assessment fits your needs.

Book a call Or: try the AI interview →

The assessments in detail

What does implementation look like?

What does it cost?

Conversation has always been the better method. Now it scales.